
We do think that he wrote the Iliad and the Odyssey--the corner stone works of literature in the Western Culture. However some scholars even doubt wither one individual wrote both works or even all of The Odyssey itself. One camp of thought has suggested that a woman may have been the author especially of the section in which Odysseus finds himself on Phonecia.
His
Works
Books On Line found on Nord
Est

75% Ilios
Links [More
Like This]
URL: http://satan.object-design.co.jp/~hiromi/link.html
Summary: HELLENIC CULTURE (MAIN PAGE) Hellenic Greek
Culture Library of Congress Resources for Greek and Latin Class Here you
will find information about the Library's resources for Classical Studies,
and links to resources available on the Internet. Greek Mythology The homepage
about Greek mythology Welcome to MYTHTEXT:Mythology Site The homepage about
mythology from all over the world . Peloponnese.
74% Greek
(GR) [More
Like This]
URL: http://www.as.ua.edu/undergrad/c_gr.html
Summary: Introduction to Homer and the grammar and syntax
of Homeric Greek, with an emphasis on the Iliad. Prerequisite: GR 101 with
a grade of "C" or higher, or language department placement.
74% Homer,
Complete Works [More
Like This]
URL: http://www.culture.gr/2/21/218/218ev/e218ev1.html
Summary: None Available
74% Untitled
[More
Like This]
URL: http://www.stolaf.edu/depts/classics/greekcourses.html
Summary: By studying the language's vocabulary, grammar,
and syntax, they not only gain appreciation for its intricacies and nuances
but also come to understand more about their own language and about language
in general. Greek 373 - Greek Historians Readings from the works of Herodotus,
the "Father of History," and Thucydides, the first "scientific" historian,
provide the backdrop for studying the.
74% InCase1
[More
Like This]
URL: http://edpa.coled.umn.edu/Iconics/Gallery1/incase1.html
Summary: Recounting the early episodes of Greek history,
the Homeric epics embodied the wisdom and crystallized the traditions,
beliefs, and values that constituted the ancient Greek cultural life style.
As significant poetical, aesthetic, historical, and pedagogical works,
the Iliad and the Odyssey told Greek generations of that moral climate
in which heroes, by combining wisdom and action, sought.
74% Children's
Homer : The Adventures of Odysseus and the Tale of Troy [More
Like This]
URL: http://www.amazon.com./exec/obidos/ISBN=0020425201/
Summary: Readers who bought Children's Homer : The Adventures
of Odysseus and the Tale of Troy also bought:. Favorite Greek Myths (Dover
Children's Thrift Classics); Bob Blaisdell, John Green (Illustrator).

him beyond the fact that his was the name
attached in antiquity by the Greeks themselves to the two great poems.
That there was an epic poet called Homer and that he played the primary
part in shaping the Iliad and the Odyssey--so much may be
said to be probable. If this assumption is accepted, then Homer must assuredly
be one of the greatest of the world's literary artists.
He is also one of the most influential authors in the widest sense, for the two epics provided the basis of Greek education and culture throughout the classical age and formed the backbone of humane education down to the time of the Roman Empire and the spread of Christianity. Indirectly through the medium of Virgil's Aeneid (which was loosely molded after the patterns of the Iliad and the Odyssey), directly through their revival under Byzantine culture from the late 8th century AD onward, and subsequently through their passage into Italy with the Greek scholars who fled westward from the Ottomans, the Homeric epics had a profound impact on the Renaissance culture of Italy. Since then the proliferation of translations has helped to make them the most important poems of the classical European tradition.
It was probably through their impact on classical Greek culture itself that the Iliad and The Odyssey most subtly affected Western standards and ideas. The Greeks regarded the great epics as something more than works of literature; they knew much of them by heart, and they valued them not only as a symbol of Hellenic unity and heroism but also as an ancient source of moral and even practical instruction.
But even if his name is known and his date and region can be inferred, Homer remains primarily a projection of the great poems themselves. Their qualities are significant of his taste and his view of the world, but they also reveal something more specific about his technique and the kind of poet he was. It has been one of the most important discoveries of Homeric scholarship, associated particularly with the name of an American scholar, Milman Parry, that the Homeric tradition was an oral one--that this was a kind of poetry made and passed down by word of mouth and without the intervention of writing. Indeed Homer's own term for a poet is aoidos, "singer."
The Odyssey describes two such poets in some detail: Phemius, the court singer in the palace of Odysseus in Ithaca, and Demodocus, who lived in the town of the semi-mythical Phaeacians and sang both for the nobles in Alcinous' palace and for the assembled public at the games held for Odysseus. On this occasion he sings of the illicit love affair of Ares and Aphrodite in a version that lasts for exactly 100 Homeric verses. This and the other songs assigned to these singers--for example, that of the Trojan Horse, summarized in the Odyssey--suggest that ordinary aoidoi in the heroic tradition worked with relatively short poems that could be given completely on a single occasion. That is what one would expect, and it is confirmed by the habits of singers and audiences at other periods and in other parts of the world (the tradition of the poet-singers of Muslim Serbia has provided the most fruitful comparison so far). Whatever the favored occasion for heroic song--whether the aristocratic feast, the religious festival, or popular gatherings in tavern or marketplace--a natural limitation on the length of a poem is imposed by the audience's available time and interest as well as by the singer's own physique and the scope of his repertoire. Such relatively short songs must have provided the backbone of the tradition inherited by Homer, and his portraits of Demodocus and Phemius are likely to be accurate in this respect. What Homer himself seems to have done is to introduce the concept of a quite different style of poetry, in the shape of a monumental poem that required more than a single hour or evening to sing and could achieve new and far more complex effects, in literary and psychological terms, than those attainable in the more anecdotal and episodic songs of his predecessors.
It can be asked how one can be so confident in classing Homer himself
as an oral singer, for if
he differed from Phemius or Demodocus in terms of length, he may also
have differed radically in his poetic techniques. The very nature of his verse may provide
a substantial part of the answer. The style of the poems is "formulaic"; that is, they rely heavily on
the use not only of stock epithets
and repeated verses or groups of verses--which can also be found to
a much lesser extent in a literate
imitator like Virgil--but also on a multitude of fixed phrases that
are employed time and time again to
express a similar idea in a similar part of the verse.
The clearest and simplest instance is the so-called noun-epithet formulas. These constitute a veritable system, in which every major god or hero possesses a variety of epithets from which the choice is made solely according to how much of the verse, and which part of it, the singer desires to use up. Odysseus is called divine Odysseus, many-counseled Odysseus, or much-enduring divine Odysseus simply in accordance with the amount of material to be fitted into the remainder of the hexameter (six-foot) verse. A ship is described as black, hollow, or symmetrical not to distinguish this particular ship from others but solely in relation to the qualities and demands of the rhythmical context. The whole noun-epithet system is both extensive and economical--it covers a great variety of subjects with very little exact reduplication or unnecessary overlap. It would seem that so refined and complex a system could not be the invention of a single poet but must have been gradually evolved in a long-standing tradition that needed both the extension and the economy for functional reasons--that depended on these fixed phrase units because of its oral nature, in which memory, practice, and a kind of improvising replace the deliberate, self-correcting, word-by-word progress of the pen-and-paper composer.
Admittedly, the rest of Homer's vocabulary is not as markedly formulaic as its noun-epithet aspect (or, another popular example, as its expressions for beginning and ending a speech). Many expressions, many portions of sentences are individually invented for the occasion, or at least so it seems. Even so, there is a strongly formulaic and ready-made component in the artificial language that was used by Homer, including its less conspicuous aspects such as the arrangement of particles, conjunctions, and pronouns.
It looks, therefore, as though Homer must have trained as an ordinary
aoidos, who began (like most of the present-day Yugoslav guslari) by building up a repertoire
of normal-length songs acquired from already established singers. The greatest heroic adventures
of the past must already
have been prominent in any repertoire, especially the Panhellenic adventures
of the Seven Against Thebes, the Argonauts, and the Achaean attack on Troy. Some aspects
of the Trojan War might
already have been expanded into songs of unusual length, though one
that was still manageable on a
single occasion. Yet the process was presumably carried much further
in the making of the
monumental Iliad, consisting of more than 16,000 verses, which would
take four or five long
evenings, and perhaps more, to perform. This breakthrough into the
monumental, which made
exceptional and almost unreasonable demands of audiences, presupposes
a singer of quite
exceptional capacity and reputation--one who could impose the new and
admittedly difficult form
upon his listeners by the sheer unfamiliar genius of his song. The
8th century BC was in other
respects, too, an era of cultural innovation, not least in the direction
of monumentality, and huge
temples (like the early temple of Hera in Samos) and colossal funerary
vases (like the mixing bowls
and amphorae in the so-called Geometric style from the Dipylon cemetery
in Athens) may have
found a literary analogue in the idea of a vast poetical treatment
of the Trojan War. But in an
important sense Homer was building upon a tendency of all known oral
heroic poetry toward
elaboration and expansion. The singer does not acquire a song from
another singer by simple
memorization. He adjusts what he hears to his existing store of phrases,
typical scenes, and themes,
and he tends to replace what is unfamiliar to him with something he
already knows, or to expand it
by adding familiar material that it happens to lack. Every singer in
a living oral tradition tends to
develop what he acquires. There is an element of improvisation, as
well as of memory, in his
appropriation of fresh material; and judging by the practice of singers
studied from the middle of the
19th century onward in Russia, Serbia, Cyprus, and Crete the inclination
to adjust, elaborate, and
improve comes naturally to all oral poets.
Homer must have decided to elaborate his materials not only in quality
but also in length and
complexity. All oral poetry is cumulative in essence; the verse is
built up by adding phrase upon
phrase, the individual description by adding verse upon verse. The
whole plot of a song consists of
the progressive accumulation of minor motifs and major themes, from
simple ideas (such as "the
hero sets off on a journey" or "addresses his enemy") through typical
scenes (such as assemblies of
men or gods) to developed but standardized thematic complexes (such
as episodes of recognition
or reconciliation).
Homer seems to have carried this cumulative tendency into new regions of poetry and narrative; in this as in other respects (for example, in his poetical language) he was applying his own individual vision to the fertile raw material of an extensive and well-known tradition.
The result is much more complex than with an ordinary traditional poem.
Understanding the origin
and essential qualities of the Iliad or the Odyssey entails trying
to sort out not only the separate components of the pre-Homeric tradition but also Homer's own probable
contributions, whether
distinguishable by their dependence on the monumental idea or by their
apparent novelty vis-à-vis
the tradition as a whole or by other means. Dialectal and linguistic
components must be identified as
far as possible--survivals of the Mycenaean language, for example,
or words used exclusively in the
Aeolian cities of the west coast of Asia Minor, or Athenian dialect
forms introduced into the poems
after the time of Homer; so must specific references to armour, clothing,
houses, burial customs, political geography, and so on, that are likely to be assignable to
the Late Bronze Age, the Early
Iron Age, or the period of Homer's own activity--at the very least
to be taken as relatively early or
late within the whole range of the poetic tradition down to Homer.
These are the tasks of modern
Homeric scholarship.
Yet such different forms and ideas in Homer are not conveniently separated
into distinct sections of the text, which can therefore be assigned to
early or late phases of composition. On the contrary, they may coexist
in a single (artificial) linguistic form or a single descriptive
phrase. Any member of the tradition, not least Homer himself, may, moreover,
have chosen to archaize on one occasion, to innovate on another.
One result is that the epics are dubious authorities for the assessment
of historical events like the attack on Troy or the status of workers,
just as they are ambiguous sources for early Greek grammar or theology.
Another is that they are not bound to a single worldview or period or mode
of perception; rather, they unite judgments and experiences never seen
together in "real" life into a whole that is literary but nevertheless
revealing of the underlying structure of human existence.
Copyright (c) 1996 Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. All Rights Reserved