Introduction

                   Generally regarded as the greatest English novelist, Charles Dickens
                   enjoyed a wider popularity than any previous author had done during his
                   lifetime. Much in his work could appeal to simple and sophisticated, to
                   the poor and to the Queen, and technological developments as well as
                   the qualities of his work enabled his fame to spread worldwide very
                   quickly. His long career saw fluctuations in the reception and sales of
                   individual novels, but none of them was negligible or uncharacteristic or
                   disregarded, and, though he is now admired for aspects and phases of his
                   work that were given less weight by his contemporaries, his popularity
                   has never ceased and his present critical standing is higher than ever
                   before. The most abundantly comic of English authors, he was much
                   more than a great entertainer. The range, compassion, and intelligence of
                   his apprehension of his society and its shortcomings enriched his novels
                   and made him both one of the great forces in 19th-century literature and
                   an influential spokesman of the conscience of his age.
 

EARLY YEARS

                   Charles John Huffam Dickens was born February 7, 1812, in
                   Portsmouth, Hampshire, but left it in infancy. His happiest childhood
                   years were spent in Chatham (1817-22), an area to which he often
                   reverts in his fiction. From 1822 he lived in London, until, in 1860, he
                   moved permanently to a country house, Gad's Hill, near Chatham. His
                   origins were middle class, if of a newfound and precarious respectability;
                   one grandfather had been a domestic servant, and the other an
                   embezzler. His father, a clerk in the navy pay office, was well paid, but
                   his extravagance and ineptitude often brought the family to financial
                   embarrassment or disaster. (Some of his failings and his ebullience are
                   dramatized in Mr. Micawber in the partly autobiographical David
Copperfield.) In 1824 the family reached bottom. Charles, the eldest
 son, had been withdrawn from school and was now set to manual work
 in a factory, and his father went to prison for debt. These shocks deeply
affected Charles. Though abhorring this brief descent into the working
class, he began to gain that sympathetic knowledge of their life and
 privations that informed his writings. Also, the images of the prison and of 
 the lost, oppressed, or bewildered child recur in many novels. Much else
                   in his character and art stems from this period, including, as the
                   20th-century novelist Angus Wilson has argued, his later difficulty, as
                   man and author, in understanding women: this may be traced to his bitter
                   resentment against his mother, who had, he felt, failed disastrously at this
                   time to appreciate his sufferings. She had wanted him to stay at work
                   when his father's release from prison and an improvement in the family's
                   fortunes made the boy's return to school possible. Happily the father's
                   view prevailed.

                   His schooling, interrupted and unimpressive, ended at 15. He became a
                   clerk in a solicitor's office, then a shorthand reporter in the lawcourts
                   (thus gaining a knowledge of the legal world often used in the novels),
                   and finally, like other members of his family, a parliamentary and
                   newspaper reporter. These years left him with a lasting affection for
                   journalism and contempt both for the law and for Parliament. His coming
                   to manhood in the reformist 1830s, and particularly his working on the
                   Liberal Benthamite Morning Chronicle (1834-36), greatly affected his
                   political outlook. Another influential event now was his rejection as suitor
                   to Maria Beadnell because his family and prospects were unsatisfactory;
                   his hopes of gaining and chagrin at losing her sharpened his determination
                   to succeed. His feelings about Maria then and at her later brief and
                   disillusioning reentry into his life are reflected in David Copperfield's
                   adoration of Dora Spenlow and in the middle-aged Arthur Clennam's
                   discovery (in Little Dorrit) that Flora Finching, who had seemed
                   enchanting years ago, was "diffuse and silly," that Flora "whom he had left
                   a lily, had become a peony."
 

Beginning of literary career.

                   Much drawn to the theatre, Dickens nearly became a professional actor
                   in 1832. In 1833 he began contributing stories and descriptive essays to
                   magazines and newspapers; these attracted attention and were reprinted
                   as Sketches by "Boz" (February 1836). The same month, he was invited
                   to provide a comic serial narrative to accompany engravings by a
                   well-known artist; seven weeks later the first installment of Pickwick
                   Papers appeared. Within a few months Pickwick was the rage and
                   Dickens the most popular author of the day. During 1836 he also wrote
                   two plays and a pamphlet on a topical issue (how the poor should be
                   allowed to enjoy the Sabbath) and, resigning from his newspaper job,
                   undertook to edit a monthly magazine, Bentley's Miscellany, in which he
                   serialized Oliver Twist (1837-39). Thus, he had two serial installments
                   to write every month. Already the first of his nine surviving children had
                   been born; he had married (in April 1836) Catherine, eldest daughter of
                   a respected Scottish journalist and man of letters, George Hogarth.
 
 
 

                   For several years his life continued at this intensity. Finding serialization
                   congenial and profitable, he repeated the Pickwick pattern of 20 monthly
                   parts in Nicholas Nickleby (1838-39); then he experimented with
                   shorter weekly installments for The Old Curiosity Shop (1840-41) and
                   Barnaby Rudge (1841). Exhausted at last, he then took a five-month
                   vacation in America, touring strenuously and receiving quasi-royal
                   honours as a literary celebrity but offending national sensibilities by
                   protesting against the absence of copyright protection. A radical critic of
                   British institutions, he had expected more from "the republic of my
                   imagination," but he found more vulgarity and sharp practice to detest
                   than social arrangements to admire. Some of these feelings appear in
                   American Notes (1842) and Martin Chuzzlewit (1843-44).
 

First novels.

                    His writing during these prolific years was remarkably various and,
                   except for his plays, resourceful. Pickwick began as high-spirited farce
                   and contained many conventional comic butts and traditional jokes; like
                   other early works, it was manifestly indebted to the contemporary
                   theatre, the 18th-century English novelists, and a few foreign classics,
                   notably Don Quixote. But, besides giving new life to old stereotypes,
                   Pickwick displayed, if sometimes in embryo, many of the features that
                   were to be blended in varying proportions throughout his fiction: attacks,
                   satirical or denunciatory, on social evils and inadequate institutions;
                   topical references; an encyclopaedic knowledge of London (always his
                   predominant fictional locale); pathos; a vein of the macabre; a delight in
                   the demotic joys of Christmas; a pervasive spirit of benevolence and
                   geniality; inexhaustible powers of character creation; a wonderful ear for
                   characteristic speech, often imaginatively heightened; a strong narrative
                   impulse; and a prose style that, if here overdependent on a few comic
                   mannerisms, was highly individual and inventive. Rapidly improvised and
                   written only weeks or days ahead of its serial publication, Pickwick
                   contains weak and jejune passages and is an unsatisfactory whole--partly
                   because Dickens was rapidly developing his craft as a novelist while
                   writing and publishing it. What is remarkable is that a first novel, written
                   in such circumstances, not only established him overnight and created a
                   new tradition of popular literature but also survived, despite its crudities,
                   as one of the best known novels in the world.
 
 
 

                   Oliver Twist and others.
 
 
 

                   His self-assurance and artistic ambitiousness had appeared in Oliver
                   Twist, where he rejected the temptation to repeat the successful
                   Pickwick formula. Though containing much comedy still, Oliver Twist is
                   more centrally concerned with social and moral evil (the workhouse and
                   the criminal world); it culminates in Bill Sikes's murdering Nancy and
                   Fagin's last night in the condemned cell at Newgate. The latter episode
                   was memorably depicted in George Cruikshank's engraving; the
                   imaginative potency of Dickens' characters and settings owes much,
                   indeed, to his original illustrators (Cruikshank for Sketches by "Boz" and
                   Oliver Twist, "Phiz" [Hablot K. Browne] for most of the other novels
                   until the 1860s). The currency of his fiction owed much, too, to its being
                   so easy to adapt into effective stage versions. Sometimes 20 London
                   theatres simultaneously were producing adaptations of his latest story; so
                   even nonreaders became acquainted with simplified versions of his
                   works. The theatre was often a subject of his fiction, too, as in the
                   Crummles troupe in Nicholas Nickleby. This novel reverted to the
                   Pickwick shape and atmosphere, though the indictment of the brutal
                   Yorkshire schools (Dotheboys Hall) continued the important innovation
                   in English fiction seen in Oliver Twist--the spectacle of the lost or
                   oppressed child as an occasion for pathos and social criticism. This was
                   amplified in The Old Curiosity Shop, where the death of Little Nell was
                   found overwhelmingly powerful at the time, though a few decades later it
                   became a byword for "Victorian sentimentality." In Barnaby Rudge he
                   attempted another genre, the historical novel. Like his later attempt in this
                   kind, A Tale of Two Cities, it was set in the late 18th century and
                   presented with great vigour and understanding (and some ambivalence of
                   attitude) the spectacle of large-scale mob violence.
 
 
 

                   To create an artistic unity out of the wide range of moods and materials
                   included in every novel, with often several complicated plots involving
                   scores of characters, was made even more difficult by Dickens' writing
                   and publishing them serially. In Martin Chuzzlewit he tried "to resist the
                   temptation of the current Monthly Number, and to keep a steadier eye
                   upon the general purpose and design" (1844 Preface). Its American
                   episodes had, however, been unpremeditated (he suddenly decided to
                   boost the disappointing sales by some America-baiting and to revenge
                   himself against insults and injuries from the American press). A
                   concentration on "the general purpose and design" was more effective in
                   the next novel, Dombey and Son (1846-48), though the experience of
                   writing the shorter, and unserialized, Christmas books had helped him
                   obtain greater coherence.
 
 
 

                   Christmas books.
 
 
 

                   A Christmas Carol (1843), suddenly conceived and written in a few
                   weeks, was the first of these Christmas books (a new literary genre thus
                   created incidentally). Tossed off while he was amply engaged in writing
                   Chuzzlewit, it was an extraordinary achievement--the one great
                   Christmas myth of modern literature. His view of life was later to be
                   described or dismissed as "Christmas philosophy," and he himself spoke
                   of "Carol philosophy" as the basis of a projected work. His
                   "philosophy," never very elaborated, involved more than wanting the
                   Christmas spirit to prevail throughout the year, but his great attachment to
                   Christmas (in his family life as well as his writings) is indeed significant
                   and has contributed to his popularity. "Dickens dead?" exclaimed a
                   London costermonger's girl in 1870. "Then will Father Christmas die
                   too?"--a tribute both to his association with Christmas and to the
                   mythological status of the man as well as of his work. The Carol
                   immediately entered the general consciousness; Thackeray, in a review,
                   called it "a national benefit, and to every man and woman who reads it a
                   personal kindness." Further Christmas books, essays, and stories
                   followed annually (except in 1847) through 1867. None equalled the
                   Carol in potency, though some achieved great immediate popularity.
                   Cumulatively they represent a celebration of Christmas attempted by no
                   other great author.
 
 
 

                   Renown.
 
 
 

                   How he struck his contemporaries in these early years appears in R.H.
                   Horne's New Spirit of the Age (1844). Dickens occupied the first and
                   longest chapter, as
 
 
 

                        . . . manifestly the product of his age . . . a genuine
                        emanation from its aggregate and entire spirit. . . . He mixes
                        extensively in society, and continually. Few public meetings
                        in a benevolent cause are without him. He speaks
                        effectively. . . . His influence upon his age is
                        extensive--pleasurable, instructive, healthy, reformatory. . . .
 
 
 

                        Mr. Dickens is, in private, very much what might be
                        expected from his works. . . . His conversation is genial . . .
                        [He] has singular personal activity, and is fond of games of
                        practical skill. He is also a great walker, and very much
                        given to dancing Sir Roger de Coverley. In private, the
                        general impression of him is that of a first-rate practical
                        intellect, with "no nonsense" about him.
 
 
 

                   He was indeed very much a public figure, actively and centrally involved
                   in his world, and a man of confident presence. He was reckoned the best
                   after-dinner speaker of the age; other superlatives he attracted included
                   his having been the best shorthand reporter on the London press and his
                   being the best amateur actor on the stage. Later he became one of the
                   most successful periodical editors and the finest dramatic recitalist of the
                   day. He was splendidly endowed with many skills. "Even irrespective of
                   his literary genius," wrote an obituarist, "he was an able and
                   strong-minded man, who would have succeeded in almost any profession
                   to which he devoted himself " (Times, June 10, 1870). Few of his
                   extraliterary skills and interests were irrelevant to the range and mode of
                   his fiction.
 
 
 

                   Privately in these early years, he was both domestic and social. He loved
                   home and family life and was a proud and efficient householder; he once
                   contemplated writing a cookbook. To his many children, he was a
                   devoted and delightful father, at least while they were young; relations
                   with them proved less happy during their adolescence. Apart from
                   periods in Italy (1844-45) and Switzerland and France (1846-47), he
                   still lived in London, moving from an apartment in Furnival's Inn to larger
                   houses as his income and family grew. Here he entertained his many
                   friends, most of them popular authors, journalists, actors, or artists,
                   though some came from the law and other professions or from commerce
                   and a few from the aristocracy. Some friendships dating from his youth
                   endured to the end, and, though often exasperated by the financial
                   demands of his parents and other relatives, he was very fond of some of
                   his family and loyal to most of the rest. Some literary squabbles came
                   later, but he was on friendly terms with most of his fellow authors, of the
                   older generation as well as his own. Necessarily solitary while writing and
                   during the long walks (especially through the streets at night) that became
                   essential to his creative processes, he was generally social at other times.
                   He enjoyed society that was unpretentious and conversation that was
                   genial and sensible but not too intellectualized or exclusively literary. High
                   society he generally avoided, after a few early incursions into the great
                   houses; he hated to be lionized or patronized.
 
 
 

                   He had about him "a sort of swell and overflow as of a prodigality of life,"
                   an American journalist said. Everyone was struck by the brilliance of his
                   eyes and his smart, even dandyish, appearance ("I have the fondness of a
                   savage for finery," he confessed). John Forster, his intimate friend and
                   future biographer, recalled him at the Pickwick period:
 
 
 

                        the quickness, keenness, and practical power, the eager,
                        restless, energetic outlook on each several feature [of his
                        face] seemed to tell so little of a student or writer of books,
                        and so much of a man of action and business in the world.
                        Light and motion flashed from every part of it.
 
 
 

                   He was proud of his art and devoted to improving it and using it to good
                   ends (his works would show, he wrote, that "Cheap Literature is not
                   behind-hand with the Age, but holds its place, and strives to do its duty"),
                   but his art never engaged all his formidable energies. He had no desire to
                   be narrowly literary.
 
 
 

                   A notable, though unsuccessful, demonstration of this was his being
                   founder-editor in 1846 of the Daily News (soon to become the leading
                   Liberal newspaper). His journalistic origins, his political convictions and
                   readiness to act as a leader of opinion, and his wish to secure a steady
                   income independent of his literary creativity and of any shifts in novel
                   readers' tastes made him attempt or plan several periodical ventures in
                   the 1840s. The return to daily journalism soon proved a mistake--the
                   biggest fiasco in a career that included few such misdirections or failures.
                   A more limited but happier exercise of his practical talents began soon
                   afterward: for more than a decade he directed, energetically and with
                   great insight and compassion, a reformatory home for young female
                   delinquents, financed by his wealthy friend Angela Burdett-Coutts. The
                   benevolent spirit apparent in his writings often found practical expression
                   in his public speeches, fund-raising activities, and private acts of charity.
 
 
 

                   Dombey and Son (1846-48) was a crucial novel in his development, a
                   product of more thorough planning and maturer thought and the first in
                   which "a pervasive uneasiness about contemporary society takes the
                   place of an intermittent concern with specific social wrongs" (Kathleen
                   Tillotson). Using railways prominently and effectively, it was very
                   up-to-date, though the questions posed included such perennial moral
                   and religious challenges as are suggested by the child Paul's first words in
                   the story: "Papa, what's money?" Some of the corruptions of money and
                   pride of place and the limitations of "respectable" values are explored,
                   virtue and human decency being discovered most often (as elsewhere in
                   Dickens) among the poor, humble, and simple. In Paul's early death
                   Dickens offered another famous pathetic episode; in Mr. Dombey he
                   made a more ambitious attempt than before at serious and internal
                   characterization. David Copperfield (1849-50) has been described as a
                   "holiday" from these larger social concerns and most notable for its
                   childhood chapters, "an enchanting vein which he had never quite found
                   before and which he was never to find again" (Edmund Wilson). Largely
                   for this reason and for its autobiographical interest, it has always been
                   among his most popular novels and was Dickens' own "favourite child." It
                   incorporates material from the autobiography he had recently begun but
                   soon abandoned and is written in the first person, a new technique for
                   him. David differs from his creator in many ways, however, though
                   Dickens uses many early experiences that had meant much to him--his
                   period of work in the factory while his father was jailed, his schooling and
                   reading, his passion for Maria Beadnell, and (more cursorily) his
                   emergence from parliamentary reporting into successful novel writing. In
                   Micawber the novel presents one of the "Dickens characters" whose
                   imaginative potency extends far beyond the narratives in which they
                   figure; Pickwick and Sam Weller, Mrs. Gamp and Mr. Pecksniff, and
                   Scrooge are some others.